January 2001
The Society
is at your service to answer questions on ethics and regulation. Contact
Ann Spaulding at (212) 719-8300, aspaulding@nysscpa.org, or send a letter
of inquiry to the Professional Ethics Committee at the Society’s address
for a written response.
Member’s Spouse as Accountant of Client
Q. A member’s spouse is employed as an accountant by a client. Would
the independence of the member or member’s firm be considered impaired
under these circumstances?
A. Independence of the member or member’s firm would not necessarily be considered impaired. The performance of accounting services by the member would not impair independence if performed in accordance with the requirements of Interpretation 101-3. Therefore, the spouse of the member could perform the same functions as the member without impairing the independence of the member or member’s firm (this does not apply to Securities and Exchange Commission clients). If, however, the spouse’s functions were not in compliance with Interpretation 101-3, independence may be impaired and should be considered under Interpretation 101-9, “Spouses and Dependent Persons.”
Revealing Client Information to Competitors
Q. A municipality in a particular state enforces a personal property
tax on business inventories, fixtures and equipment, and machinery by
retaining a CPA firm to examine the books and records of the business
to be sure the proper amount has been declared. In the course of its engagement,
the CPA firm will examine sales, purchases, gross profit percentages,
and inventories as well as fixed asset accounts. A member serving one
of the companies involved objects to these procedures on the ground that
information gathered from the books and records of his client could be
inadvertently conveyed to competitors by employees of the CPA firm doing
the audit. Is such an engagement ethically proper?
A. It would be proper for a member’s firm to perform such services. It should be emphasized to everyone concerned that Rule 301 prohibits members from revealing to others any confidential information obtained in their professional capacity.
Member Providing Services for Company Executives
Q. A member has been approached by a company, for which he or she
may or may not perform other professional services, to provide personal
financial planning or tax services for its executives. The executives
are aware of the company’s relationship with the member, if any, and have
also consented to the arrangement. The performance of the services could
result in the member recommending to the executives actions that may be
adverse to the company. What rules of conduct should the member consider
before accepting and during the performance of the engagement?
A. Before accepting and during the performance of the engagement, the member should consider the applicability of Rule 102, Integrity and Objectivity. If the member believes that he or she can perform the personal financial planning or tax services with objectivity, the member would not be prohibited from accepting the engagement. The member should also consider informing the company and the executives of possible results of the engagement. During the performance of the services, the member should consider his or her professional responsibility to the clients (that is, the company and the executives) under Rule 301, Confidential Client Information.